Call for evidence outcome

Fisheries: remote electronic monitoring call for evidence

This was published under the 2019 to 2022 Johnson Conservative government
This call for evidence has closed

Read the full outcome

Fisheries: Summary of responses to remote electronic monitoring call for evidence

Request an accessible format.
If you use assistive technology (such as a screen reader) and need a version of this document in a more accessible format, please email [email protected]. Please tell us what format you need. It will help us if you say what assistive technology you use.

Detail of outcome

We’ve considered all the submissions and will continue to use the evidence provided to inform further thinking on the use of remote electronic monitoring in England. We’ll engage more with stakeholders in the near future around the topics that were highlighted in this call for evidence.

We received 37 responses, 31 were submitted online on the platform Citizen Space and 6 were submitted directly.


Original call for evidence

Summary

Seeking views on our plans to increase the use of remote electronic monitoring.

This call for evidence was held on another website.

This call for evidence ran from
to

Call for evidence description

We want to know what you think about our plans to increase the use of remote electronic monitoring (REM) on English registered fishing vessels and vessels fishing in English waters.

REM includes integrated on-board systems of cameras, gear sensors, video storage, and global positioning system units, which capture comprehensive videos of fishing activity.

Updates to this page

Published 19 October 2020
Last updated 7 May 2021 + show all updates
  1. Uploaded a document summarising the responses to a call for evidence for expanding the use of remote electronic monitoring in England.

  2. First published.

Sign up for emails or print this page