Closed consultation

Friction ridge detail comparison

We are analysing your feedback

Visit this page again soon to download the outcome to this public feedback.

Summary

We are seeking comments on the revised definition and the specific requirements for FSA–MTP101 – friction ridge detail: comparison.

This consultation ran from
to

Consultation description

The Forensic Science Regulator seeks comments from the wider forensic science community on the FSR’s intention to incorporate changes to the code, FSA definition and FSA specific requirements for the undertaking of FSA–MTP101 friction ridge detail comparison, into version 2 of the statutory code.

The main changes are:

  1. The definition of friction ridge detail comparison has been amended to avoid ambiguity that areas of friction ridge detail from the human body should be treated differently in the comparison process.

  2. The sub-activities in the FSA definition have been revised and the FSA specific requirement now include a section on the scope of accreditation that is required for the undertaking of friction ridge detail comparison which mirrors the sub activities. The sub activities are; searching, identity check, scene linking, direct comparison. This will ensure that when organisations apply for accreditation it will be based on the definition of the FSA set out in the code.

  3. The sections in the FSA specific requirements now reference the relevant clauses in ISO/IEC 17025:2017 and ILAC-G19:06/2022. This will ensure that the achievement of accreditation is based on the requirements in the code.

See also Regulator’s notification 03-2024: friction ridge detail comparison.

Comments to be sent to [email protected] by 13 September 2024.

Documents

Consultation draft of specific requirements to support FSA-MTP101 friction ridge detail: comparison

Request an accessible format.
If you use assistive technology (such as a screen reader) and need a version of this document in a more accessible format, please email [email protected]. Please tell us what format you need. It will help us if you say what assistive technology you use.

Consultation draft for FSA-MTP101 reframed as activities/services: a holistic approach

Request an accessible format.
If you use assistive technology (such as a screen reader) and need a version of this document in a more accessible format, please email [email protected]. Please tell us what format you need. It will help us if you say what assistive technology you use.

Updates to this page

Published 22 August 2024
Last updated 23 August 2024 + show all updates
  1. Accessible versions of the consultation documents have been added.

  2. First published.

Sign up for emails or print this page