Consultation outcome

Future assessment arrangements for GCSE (9 to 1) computer science

From:: Ofqual
Published: 5 November 2018
Last updated: 18 February 2019 — See all updates

Applies to England

Read the full outcome

Decisions on future assessment arrangements for GCSE (9 to 1) computer science

Ref: Ofqual/19/6464/1

PDF, 741 KB, 14 pages

This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology.

Request an accessible format.

If you use assistive technology (such as a screen reader) and need a version of this document in a more accessible format, please email [email protected]. Please tell us what format you need. It will help us if you say what assistive technology you use.

Computer science GCSE (9 to 1): Regulatory Impact Assessment

Ref: Ofqual/19/6464/3

PDF, 327 KB, 10 pages

This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology.

Request an accessible format.

Detail of outcome

We have decided to implement our preferred option – assessing programming skills via examination. However, we are not specifying the form this assessment should take beyond the requirement that it meets our definition of an exam. This affords exam boards the opportunity to be innovative in their approach to assessing programming skills.

Feedback received

Analysis of responses to our consultation on future assessment arrangements for GCSE (9 to 1) computer science

PDF, 1010 KB, 43 pages

This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology.

Request an accessible format.

Detail of feedback received

We received 394 responses to our consultation. 73 of these were from organisations and 321 were personal responses.

Original consultation

Consultation description

This consultation follows interim changes we made to the qualification’s assessment arrangements in early 2018. It does not concern the subject content for GCSE computer science, which is set by the government. Programming will remain a key feature of the qualification. Rather, in considering the options for the longer term, our priority has been to ensure the assessments validly assess all of the subject content in a way that contributes towards students’ final grades.

We have discussed with teachers and subject associations the potential ways by which students’ programming skills could be assessed in the longer term.

We have concluded that it is not possible to use non-exam assessment in this qualification to assess programming skills in a way that is manageable, reliable and fair. We have also concluded that exam boards could assess programming skills in different and potentially innovative ways under exam conditions (whereby all students take assessments set and marked by exam boards at the same time, under supervision). Moreover, we think this approach is likely to lead to the most effective development of programming skills, as it allows teachers to adopt the approach to developing those skills they feel is best for their students.

Documents