Consultation outcome

TV Licence Enforcement Review

This consultation has concluded

Read the full outcome

Response of the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport to the TV Licence Fee Enforcement Review - Print ready

Request an accessible format.
If you use assistive technology (such as a screen reader) and need a version of this document in a more accessible format, please email [email protected]. Please tell us what format you need. It will help us if you say what assistive technology you use.

Response of the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport to the TV Licence Fee Enforcement Review - Accessible format

Request an accessible format.
If you use assistive technology (such as a screen reader) and need a version of this document in a more accessible format, please email [email protected]. Please tell us what format you need. It will help us if you say what assistive technology you use.

TV Licence Fee Enforcement Review

Request an accessible format.
If you use assistive technology (such as a screen reader) and need a version of this document in a more accessible format, please email [email protected]. Please tell us what format you need. It will help us if you say what assistive technology you use.

Detail of outcome

The independent review which looked into whether the current sanctions in place for failure to hold a TV licence are appropriate, fair, and represent value for money published it’s final report on 16 July 2015.

The Secretary of State’s response to the report was published on 15 October 2015.

Feedback received

BBC Response

Request an accessible format.
If you use assistive technology (such as a screen reader) and need a version of this document in a more accessible format, please email [email protected]. Please tell us what format you need. It will help us if you say what assistive technology you use.

IOMG Response

Request an accessible format.
If you use assistive technology (such as a screen reader) and need a version of this document in a more accessible format, please email [email protected]. Please tell us what format you need. It will help us if you say what assistive technology you use.

Callcredit Response

Request an accessible format.
If you use assistive technology (such as a screen reader) and need a version of this document in a more accessible format, please email [email protected]. Please tell us what format you need. It will help us if you say what assistive technology you use.

Scottish Courts and Tribunals Service Response

Request an accessible format.
If you use assistive technology (such as a screen reader) and need a version of this document in a more accessible format, please email [email protected]. Please tell us what format you need. It will help us if you say what assistive technology you use.

Government of Jersey Response

Request an accessible format.
If you use assistive technology (such as a screen reader) and need a version of this document in a more accessible format, please email [email protected]. Please tell us what format you need. It will help us if you say what assistive technology you use.

C4 Response

Request an accessible format.
If you use assistive technology (such as a screen reader) and need a version of this document in a more accessible format, please email [email protected]. Please tell us what format you need. It will help us if you say what assistive technology you use.

PACT Response

Request an accessible format.
If you use assistive technology (such as a screen reader) and need a version of this document in a more accessible format, please email [email protected]. Please tell us what format you need. It will help us if you say what assistive technology you use.

MoJ Response

Request an accessible format.
If you use assistive technology (such as a screen reader) and need a version of this document in a more accessible format, please email [email protected]. Please tell us what format you need. It will help us if you say what assistive technology you use.

Detail of feedback received

A number of responses were received from both organisations and members of the public. Organisational responses which were been included within the Review have been published in the documents above and the links below. We have not published any responses received by members of the public.

Centre for citizenship

Christians against poverty

Money advice trust

TV Licence Resistance/ TV Licensing Blog/Licencefree.co.uk

Voice of the Listener and Viewer


Original consultation

Summary

The independent review which looked into whether the current sanctions in place for failure to hold a TV licence are appropriate, fair, and represent value for money.

This consultation ran from
to

Consultation description

The Review into TV Licence Enforcement was announced on the 9th September 2014 and was led by Independent Reviewer, David Perry QC. The Review was established to consider whether the sanctions currently in place for failure to hold a TV licence are appropriate and fair, and whether the current regime represents value for money for licence fee payers and taxpayers. The Review identified and assessed options for amending the current enforcement regime, including those for decriminalisation of TV licence evasion offences, and whether these options would represent an improvement, based on the key considerations set out in the Terms of Reference.

This consultation set out a number of options and invited evidence and views on each.

For further information about the review please click here.

The consultation has now closed.

Documents

TV Licence Enforcement Review - Consultation Document

Request an accessible format.
If you use assistive technology (such as a screen reader) and need a version of this document in a more accessible format, please email [email protected]. Please tell us what format you need. It will help us if you say what assistive technology you use.

Updates to this page

Published 12 February 2015
Last updated 15 October 2015 + show all updates
  1. Response of the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport to the report has now been published.

  2. Report following the consultation have been added.

  3. First published.

Sign up for emails or print this page