Research and analysis

An analysis of the Commission for Countering Extremism's call for evidence

King's College London was tasked by the Commission for Countering Extremism to conduct an analysis of data through the commission's online call for evidence.

Documents

An analysis of the Commission for Countering Extremism's call for evidence: report 1 - public understanding of extremism

Request an accessible format.
If you use assistive technology (such as a screen reader) and need a version of this document in a more accessible format, please email [email protected]. Please tell us what format you need. It will help us if you say what assistive technology you use.

An analysis of the Commission for Countering Extremism's call for evidence: report 2 - tactics and harms

Request an accessible format.
If you use assistive technology (such as a screen reader) and need a version of this document in a more accessible format, please email [email protected]. Please tell us what format you need. It will help us if you say what assistive technology you use.

An analysis of the Commission for Countering Extremism’s call for evidence: technical annex

Request an accessible format.
If you use assistive technology (such as a screen reader) and need a version of this document in a more accessible format, please email [email protected]. Please tell us what format you need. It will help us if you say what assistive technology you use.

Details

The 1st report on public understanding of extremism analyses this data to seek to understand public perceptions of extremism, as well as exploring the boundaries of what the public see as constituting extremism.

The 2nd report on tactics and harms contains findings from our analysis of these responses relating to the tactics viewed by practitioners to be extremist as well as the harms that emerge from those tactics.

The technical annex explains the process that The Policy Institute at King’s College London undertook to analyse the results of the Commission for Countering Extremism’s call for evidence.

We are aware these publications may have accessibility issues. We are reviewing them so that we can fix these.

Read more about our accessible documents policy.

Updates to this page

Published 7 October 2019

Sign up for emails or print this page