Country policy and information note: sexual orientation and gender identity, Bangladesh, September 2023 (accessible)
Updated 20 December 2024
Version 5.0
September 2023
Executive summary
Updated on: 20 June 2023
Same-sex sexual activity between consenting males is criminalised under Section 377 of the Bangladesh Penal Code and punishable by imprisonment. Though rarely enforced, it is used to arrest, harass and extort individuals based on their sexual orientation, contributing to a climate of fear and repression for LGBTI individuals.
It is unclear as to whether female same-sex sexual activity is included within the ambit of Section 377 and there is no evidence of cases in which criminal prosecutions have been brought against lesbians in relation to their sexual identity. However, this should be viewed in the context of the general lack of societal awareness or understanding of female same-sex relationships, which may lead to social invisibility.
The hijra (a distinct community that can fall under the umbrella term trans) were legally recognised as a ‘third gender’ in 2013, but there is no legal framework for recognising other gender-diverse people who do not fall within the hijra community.
In general, a person who identifies as LGBTI is unlikely to face treatment by the state, which is sufficiently serious either by its nature or repetition, or by an accumulation of measures, to amount to persecution or serious harm. The onus is on the person to demonstrate otherwise.
Societal attitudes towards LGBTI people tend to be conservative and influenced by traditional cultural and religious values. LGBTI persons are often stigmatised, leading to discrimination, social exclusion and hostility. Many face pressure to hide their sexual orientation or gender identity to avoid harassment and violence. Gay men and lesbians are compelled by family and society to enter into heterosexual marriages.
While there are supportive allies and groups working for tolerance and equality, progress in acceptance and rights is limited.
In general, a person who identifies as LGBTI and is open about their sexual orientation or gender identity is likely to face treatment by non-state actors, which is sufficiently serious either by its nature or repetition, or by an accumulation of measures, to amount to persecution or serious harm.
If a person does not openly express their sexual orientation or gender identity consideration must be given to the reasons why they do not. Each case must be considered on its facts with the onus on the person to demonstrate that they would be at real risk on return.
In general, the state is able, but unwilling to offer sufficient protection from non-state actors, including ‘rogue’ state actors. Decision makers must consider each case on its facts, with the onus on the person to demonstrate why they would not be able to obtain protection.
Given that homophobic attitudes are prevalent throughout the country there is unlikely to be any place in Bangladesh to which a lesbian, gay or bisexual person could reasonably relocate without making fundamental changes to their behaviour.
Where a claim is refused, it is unlikely to be certifiable as ‘clearly unfounded’.
Assessment
About the assessment
This section considers the evidence relevant to this note – that is information in the country information, refugee/human rights laws and policies, and applicable caselaw – and provides an assessment of whether, in general:
-
a person is reasonably likely to face a real risk of persecution/serious harm by the state or non-state actors because of their sexual orientation and/or gender identity and expression
-
a person is able to obtain protection from the state (or quasi state bodies)
-
a person is reasonably able to relocate within a country or territory
-
a grant of asylum, humanitarian protection or other form of leave is likely, and
-
if a claim is refused, it is likely or unlikely to be certifiable as ‘clearly unfounded’ under section 94 of the Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002.
Decision makers must, however, still consider all claims on an individual basis, taking into account each case’s specific facts.
This note provides an assessment of the general situation for gay men, lesbians, bisexuals, trans and intersex (LGBTI) persons, and those perceived as such. They are referred to collectively as ‘LGBTI persons’, although the experiences of each group may differ.
1. Material facts, credibility and other checks/referrals
1.1 Credibility
1.1.1 For information on assessing credibility, see the instruction on Assessing Credibility and Refugee Status, the Asylum Instructions on Sexual identity issues in the asylum claim and Gender identity issues in the asylum claim.
1.1.2 Decision makers must also check if there has been a previous application for a UK visa or another form of leave. Asylum applications matched to visas should be investigated prior to the asylum interview (see the Asylum Instruction on Visa Matches, Asylum Claims from UK Visa Applicants).
1.1.3 In cases where there are doubts surrounding a person’s claimed place of origin, decision makers should also consider language analysis testing, where available (see the Asylum Instruction on Language Analysis).
Official – sensitive: Not for disclosure – Start of section
1.1.4 The information on this page has been removed as it is restricted for internal Home Office use.
Official – sensitive: Not for disclosure – End of section
1.2 Exclusion
1.2.1 Decision makers must consider whether there are serious reasons for considering whether one (or more) of the exclusion clauses is applicable. Each case must be considered on its individual facts and merits.
1.2.2 If the person is excluded from the Refugee Convention, they will also be excluded from a grant of humanitarian protection (which has a wider range of exclusions than refugee status).
1.2.3 For guidance on exclusion and restricted leave, see the Asylum Instruction on Exclusion under Articles 1F and 33(2) of the Refugee Convention, Humanitarian Protection and the instruction on Restricted Leave.
Official – sensitive: Not for disclosure – Start of section
The information on this page has been removed as it is restricted for internal Home Office use.
Official – sensitive: Not for disclosure – End of section
2. Convention reason(s)
2.1.1 Actual or imputed particular social group (PSG).
2.1.2 LGBTI persons form a PSG in Bangladesh within the meaning of the Refugee Convention because they share an innate characteristic or a common background that cannot be changed, or share a characteristic or belief that is so fundamental to identity or conscience that a person should not be forced to renounce it and have a distinct identity in Bangladesh because the group is perceived as being different by the surrounding society.
2.1.3 Although LGBTI persons form a PSG, establishing such membership is not sufficient to be recognised as a refugee. The question to be addressed is whether the person has a well-founded fear of persecution on account of their actual or imputed convention reason.
2.1.4 For further guidance on the 5 Refugee Convention grounds see the Asylum Instruction, Assessing Credibility and Refugee Status.
3. Risk
3.1 Risk from the state
3.1.1 In general, a person who identifies as LGBTI is unlikely to be at risk of treatment from state actors which is sufficiently serious either by its nature and repetition, or by an accumulation of measures, to amount to persecution or serious harm. The onus is on the person to demonstrate otherwise.
3.1.2 If a person does not openly express their sexual orientation or gender identity, decision makers must consider why. Due to social norms, most LGBTI people in Bangladesh choose to keep their sexual orientation a private matter to avoid discrimination, social exclusion and hostility from their families and wider society. Each case must be considered on its facts.
3.1.3 Bangladesh retains colonial laws criminalising same-sex sexual activities (Section 377 of the Bangladesh Penal Code), punishable by a fine and a prison term not exceeding 10 years, or life imprisonment. Section 377 applies to same-sex sexual activity between men. Although it is rarely enforced, its existence reinforces a general climate of homophobia and LGBTI groups claim the government retains the law due to societal pressure. If the law were to be applied, it would be disproportionate and discriminatory. There are no laws in Bangladesh protecting people against discrimination based on their sexual orientation or gender identity, and no legal recognition of same-sex unions or marriage (see Legal context).
3.1.4 It is unclear as to whether female same-sex sexual activity is included within the ambit of Section 377. The Australian Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade (DFAT) stated in November 2022 that it was not aware of any cases in which criminal prosecutions have been brought against lesbians in relation to their sexual identity. However, this should be viewed in the context of the general lack of societal awareness or understanding of female same-sex relationships (see Legal context and Societal norms and acceptance).
3.1.5 Bangladesh has made progress since 2013 in legally recognising the hijra (a distinct community that can fall under the umbrella term transgender), allowing them to identify as a ‘third gender’ on passports and other official government documents. There is no legal recognition of non-hijra trans persons, who cannot apply for national identity cards or register to vote on this basis, but can apply for passports under the ‘other’ category (see Legal context).
3.1.6 Although rarely enforced, Section 377 is used to arrest, harass or extort gay and bisexual men, or those perceived as such. Hijras generally avoid punishment under the code because, according to a study on LGBTI persons by the International Republican Institute (IRI), of a widely held misunderstanding that they are asexual and therefore not ‘controversial’. However, the criminalisation of same-sex sexual activity creates a climate of fear of arrest amongst the LGBTI community. Laws against pornography, drug or alcohol offences, or a suspicious-behaviour provision of the police code, are also used to target gay men. Participants in the IRI study said the police sexually assault gay and bisexual men and trans women (see State treatment and attitudes).
3.1.7 Non-governmental organisations (NGOs) working on LGBTI issues are unable to register with the government as official LGBTI NGOs due to stigma and discrimination (see NGOs and support).
3.1.8 For further guidance on assessing risk, see the Asylum Instruction on Assessing Credibility and Refugee Status, and the Asylum Instructions on Sexual identity issues in the asylum claim and Gender identity issues in the asylum claim.
3.2 Risk from non-state actors
3.2.1 In general, a person who identifies as LGBTI is likely to be at risk of treatment from non-state actors which is sufficiently serious either by its nature and repetition, or by an accumulation of measures, to amount to persecution or serious harm.
3.2.2 If a person does not openly express their sexual orientation or gender identity, decision makers must consider why. Due to social taboos and societal pressure to conform to heterosexual, cultural and religious norms, including marriage and having children, the majority of LGBTI people in Bangladesh choose to keep their sexual orientation a private matter to avoid discrimination, social exclusion and hostility from their families and wider society (see Societal norms and acceptance). Lesbians and bisexual women are likely to face greater pressure to marry, are at higher risk of gender-based violence just for being women, and are less likely than men to have social and economic independence (see Lesbians and bisexual women).
3.2.3 For general information on the position of women, see the Country Policy and Information Note on Bangladesh: Women facing gender-based violence.
3.2.4 LGBTI persons frequently face discrimination, violence, verbal and sexual harassment, extortion, predominantly by community and family members. However, due to stigma, intolerance and the criminalisation of same-sex sexual activity, most incidents go unreported. Conversion therapy is reported to be widespread, as is discrimination in areas such as education employment, housing, and access to government services, including healthcare and justice (see Societal norms and acceptance and Access to, and treatment in, services).
3.2.5 There is some evidence of tolerance and acceptance of the hijra community, who are generally more able to express their identity. For example, a hijra was elected as mayor in a rural town in 2021, and in 2022 a hijra was elected to a union council. However, familial acceptance is reported to be low and the IRI survey noted the most frequent discrimination reported by respondents occurred against hijras and trans persons (see Trans persons, including hijras).
3.2.6 LGBTI spaces are mostly limited to online events, though these are subject to negative comments and threats of violence (see LGBTI community).
3.2.7 For further guidance on assessing risk, see the Asylum Instruction on Assessing Credibility and Refugee Status, and the Asylum Instructions on Sexual identity issues in the asylum claim and Gender identity issues in the asylum claim.
4. Protection
4.1.1 Where the person has a well-founded fear of persecution from the state they will not, in general, be able to obtain protection from the authorities.
4.1.2 In general, the state is able, but unwilling to offer sufficient protection from non-state actors, including ‘rogue’ state actors. Decision makers must consider each case on its facts, with the onus on the person to demonstrate why they would not be able to obtain protection.
4.1.3 Bangladesh has a functioning criminal justice system although it is highly politicised. Police professionalism varies although measures are in place to address accountability for misconduct. For more, see the Country Policy and Information Note, Bangladesh: Actors of protection.
4.1.4 In 2021, 6 members of a banned Islamic group were sentenced to death for the 2016 murder of 2 LGBTI rights activists. However, in general, steps taken to investigate, prosecute and punish those involved in violence against LGBTI persons are limited (Police and judicial response to violence against LGBTI persons).
4.1.5 Various NGOs advocate for LGBTI rights and, whilst they cannot provide protection to LGBTI individuals in lieu of the state, they may be able to assist the person in availing themselves of the protection of the state by providing support and advice (see NGOs and support).
4.1.6 For further guidance on assessing state protection, see the Asylum Instruction on Assessing Credibility and Refugee Status, and the Asylum Instructions on Sexual identity issues in the asylum claim and Gender identity issues in the asylum claim.
5. Internal relocation
5.1.1 Where the person has a well-founded fear of persecution from the state, they are unlikely to be able to relocate to escape that risk.
5.1.2 Where the person has a well-founded fear of persecution from non-state actors, including ‘rogue’ state-actors, decision makers must determine whether the person could relocate internally to a place where they would not face a real risk of persecution or serious harm and where they can reasonably be expected to stay. Internal relocation will not be an option if it depends on the person concealing their sexual orientation and/or gender identity in the proposed new location for fear of persecution.
5.1.3 Given that homophobic attitudes are prevalent throughout the country there is unlikely to be any place in Bangladesh to which a lesbian, gay or bisexual person could reasonably relocate without making fundamental changes to their behaviour (see State treatment and attitudes and Societal treatment and attitudes).
5.1.4 For further guidance on considering internal relocation and factors to be taken into account see the Asylum Instruction on Assessing Credibility and Refugee Status, and the Asylum Instructions on Sexual identity issues in the asylum claim and Gender identity issues in the asylum claim.
6. Certification
6.1.1 Where a claim is refused, it is unlikely to be certifiable as ‘clearly unfounded’ under section 94 of the Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002.
6.1.2 For further guidance on certification, see Certification of Protection and Human Rights claims under section 94 of the Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002 (clearly unfounded claims).
Country information
About the country information
This contains publicly available or disclosable country of origin information (COI) which has been gathered, collated and analysed in line with the research methodology. It provides the evidence base for the assessment.
The structure and content of this section follow a terms of reference which sets out the general and specific topics relevant to the scope of this note.
Decision makers must use relevant COI as the evidential basis for decisions.
It should be noted that, according to the European Union Agency for Asylum (EUAA) Research Guide on LGBTIQ, dated February 2023, the broad definition of LGBT/LGBTI/LGBTIQ (lesbian, gay, bisexual, trans, intersex and queer persons) used in various sources may not refer to all groups covered in this concept but only to some categories, most often gay men[footnote 1].
For general information on Bangladesh including history, geography and demography and political context see the Country Background Note: Bangladesh.
section updated: 20 June 2023
7. Terminology
7.1.1 According to the Australian Government’s Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade (DFAT) report on Bangladesh, dated November 2022, which was based on a range of sources, LGBTI people in Bangladesh ‘… use unique slang due to cultural taboos that prohibit open discussion of LGBTI issues. English words to describe LGBTI issues do not have equivalents in Bengali and slurs may be used in translation either through lack of alternatives or because of the homophobia of the translator. Highly educated and wealthy LGBTI people are more likely to understand words and concepts or use English to describe them.’[footnote 2]
section updated: 20 June 2023
8. Legal context
8.1 Constitution
8.1.1 The Constitution of Bangladesh does not directly refer to sexual orientation or gender identity in articles defining the rights of citizens, but provides:
-
Article 27: ‘All citizens are equal before law and are entitled to equal protection of law’
-
Article 28(1): ‘The State shall not discriminate against any citizen on grounds only of religion, race, caste, sex or place of birth’
-
Article 29(1): ‘There shall be equality of opportunity for all citizens in respect of employment or office in the service of the Republic.’[footnote 3]
8.1.2 According to the International Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Trans and Intersex Association (ILGA) December 2020 report, there are no laws in Bangladesh protecting people against discrimination on the basis of their sexual orientation or gender identity[footnote 4].
8.1.3 The draft Anti-Discrimination Law, laid before parliament in April 2022[footnote 5], proposed to ban discrimination on various grounds[footnote 6]. The UN Special Rapporteur on extreme poverty and human rights stated in his end of mission statement, following a visit to Bangladesh from 17 to 29 May 2023, that ‘While Section 3 of the bill recognizes discrimination against the “third gender”, it does not mention Hijra (transgender) communities – who are the margins and subjected to extreme levels of discrimination.’[footnote 7] The bill did not address other sexual minorities[footnote 8].
8.2 Bangladesh Penal Code
8.2.1 The Bangladesh Penal Code 1860, a retained British colonial law, does not specifically refer to same-sex sexual activity, but refers to ‘unnatural offences’. Section 377 states:
‘Section 377: Unnatural offences: Whoever voluntary has carnal intercourse against the order of nature with man, woman, or animal, shall be punished with imprisonment for life, or imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to 10 years, and shall also be liable to fine.
‘Explanation: penetration is sufficient to constitute the carnal intercourse necessary to the offence described in this section.’[footnote 9]
8.2.2 According to the Human Dignity Trust, an LGBTI rights group, ‘Only men are criminalised under this law.’[footnote 10]
8.2.3 It is unclear as to whether lesbianism is included within the ambit of Section 377 of the Bangladesh Penal Code, as indicated by ILGA’s State-Sponsored Homophobia report for 2019, which noted that female-female sexual activity was not a criminal offence under existing penal law, although elsewhere within the same report it stated that the provision in the penal code was relevant for ‘all genders.’[footnote 11]
8.2.4 Human Rights Watch noted that Section 376 of the Penal Code sets out the punishment for rape[footnote 12], but ‘… fails to provide legal protection to men, boys, transgender, hijra, or intersex people who are victims of sexual assault.’[footnote 13]
8.3 Trans people, including hijras and intersex persons
8.3.1 In the culture of the Indian sub-continent, hijras are regarded as a ‘third gender’ and most hijras see themselves as ‘neither man nor woman’[footnote 14] [footnote 15]. They cannot accurately be described as ‘eunuchs’ or ‘hermaphrodites’ or ‘transsexual women’, which are Western terms[footnote 16] [footnote 17]. Most hijras are born male and some will have undergone a ritual emasculation operation, which includes castration[footnote 18] [footnote 19]. A minority are born intersex[footnote 20] [footnote 21].
8.3.2 Hijras can fall under the umbrella term transgender[footnote 22] but, according to 2 sources interviewed during the UK Home Office Fact Finding Mission (FFM) to Bangladesh in May 2017, not all transgender persons are hijras, even though they may be viewed as such[footnote 23]. The Kaleidoscope Human Rights Foundation, Australia, noted in September 2016 ‘The Hijra community often identifies itself as an alternative gender, rather than as transgender.’[footnote 24]
8.3.3 Although most hijras wear women’s clothing and have adopted female mannerisms, they generally do not attempt to pass as women[footnote 25]. Becoming a hijra involves a process of initiation into a hijra ‘family’, or small group, under a guru teacher[footnote 26] [footnote 27]. Therefore, hijra is not a gender but instead a community[footnote 28]. George Arney wrote, in a BBC News article of 30 November 2000, that hijras have been part of the South Asian landscape for thousands of years[footnote 29].
8.3.4 In November 2013, the Bangladesh government granted hijras legal status as members of a ‘third gender’ for ‘purposes of voting, travel, identification and other core civil rights.’[footnote 30]
8.3.5 The Bangladesh Legal Aid and Services Trust (BLAST) report on gender identity in Bangladeshi law, published in December 2019, noted that, in January 2014, the Ministry of Social Welfare (MSW) ‘… published a gazette notification stating that the Hijra community “shall be recognised as the ‘Hijra sex/gender’ (‘Hijra linggo’).”’[footnote 31] The BLAST report commented ‘This recognition expressly refers to “Hijra”. It does not deal with other communities and individuals who have non-normative gender and sexual expressions, and do not conform to the gender assigned to them at birth (transgender women and men), but do not belong to the Hijra culture.’[footnote 32]
8.3.6 Human Rights Watch (HRW) reported in 2016 that ‘Bangladesh does not have a policy outlining the measures individuals must take to legally change the gender marker on their official documents from “male” to “hijra,” and there is no clarity about who qualifies as a hijra. Absent such guidelines, officials involved in implementing the hijra circular [gazette notification] have acted on their personal understandings of what hijra means.’[footnote 33]
8.3.7 In April 2019, following amendments to the Voter List Act 2009 and the Voter List Rules 2012, hijras were given the option to vote as ‘hijra’ opposed to the ‘male’ and ‘female’ options on the voter registration form[footnote 34].
8.3.8 BLAST noted in regard to official documents that ‘… national identity cards [NID] now include a “Hijra” category in addition to “male” and “female”. In contrast, passports include a category of “other” in addition to “male” and “female”. Some government forms (e.g. account opening application forms of state-run banks) now include a category of “third gender”.’[footnote 35]
8.3.9 The same report noted that the lack of uniformity in gender identity options created barriers for gender-diverse individuals, stating that:
‘The “Other” and “Third Gender” options used in the above forms accommodate both gender non-conforming individuals identifying as Hijra and those not identifying as Hijra. In contrast, the “Hijra” option only applies to those who are part of Hijra culture and identify as Hijra. This means that non-Hijra transgender individuals cannot apply for an NID and therefore cannot register as a voter. To have valid official documents, gender diverse individuals who are non-Hijra must choose the “Hijra” option.’[footnote 36]
8.3.10 The BLAST report added, ‘Currently an individual has to undergo multiple processes of verification by government authorities, based on physical examinations, background checks by the police, and/or certificates from their local Ward Commissioner or Union Parishad, to be identified as “Hijra” in any official document.’[footnote 37]
8.3.11 According to the DFAT report of November 2022, hijras ‘… lack inheritance rights under sharia (Islamic law) provisions governing personal status matters.’[footnote 38]
8.3.12 CPIT could find no specific information on the legal rights of intersex persons in the sources consulted (see Bibliography).
8.3.13 Some hijras are born intersex[footnote 39]. The International Republican Institute (IRI), an American non-profit, non-partisan organisation committed to advancing freedom and democracy worldwide[footnote 40], published a report on Bangladesh’s LGBTI community, dated 8 April 2021, based on a mixed-method study of Bangladesh’s LGBTI community that combined focus group discussions (FGDs) with 76 participants and an online survey, completed by 579 respondents (see the report for the full methodology)[footnote 41]. The report noted that ‘In official government discourse and the public’s common perception, Hijras are intersex – not transgender. Because intersex is not a sexual orientation – intersex people are widely viewed as asexual in Bangladesh – they are not considered “controversial.”’[footnote 42]
8.4 Same-sex marriage, civil unions and adoption rights
8.4.1 The ILGA December 2020 report noted that there is no legal recognition of same-sex civil unions or marriages, and same-sex couples cannot adopt children[footnote 43].
section updated: 20 June 2023
9. State treatment and attitudes
9.1 Overview
9.1.1 The US Department of State noted in its human rights report for 2022 (USSD HR Report 2022) that ‘Although the government made some progress in promoting social acceptance of hijra persons, the government made limited efforts to promote the rights of others in the LGBTQI+ community and did not offer legal recognition.’[footnote 44]
9.2 Use of laws against LGBTI persons
9.2.1 While same-sex sexual relations are criminalised under the penal code, the USSD HR Report 2022 stated that the authorities did not actively enforce the law and, according to members of LGBTI groups, it was retained due to societal pressure[footnote 45]. The DFAT report, dated November 2022, stated that prosecutions under Section 377 were rare, which was likely due to the LGBTI community being hidden[footnote 46]. DFAT also stated that it was not aware of criminal prosecutions for lesbian sex[footnote 47].
9.2.2 ILGA reported in December 2021 that, according to information provided by the LGBTI rights group Inclusive Bangladesh, ‘On 15 September 2020 an individual identified in local media as a “well-known woman” who has been identified by local activists as a transgender man was arrested for homosexual activity. Some media outlets have claimed the accused had a habit of “forcing girls into homosexuality”, and it is unclear to what degree this is the interpretation of detractor media, or if some form of coercion or blackmail was involved.’[footnote 48] Corroborating information could not be found amongst the sources consulted by CPIT (see Bibliography).
9.3 Violence, harassment and discrimination
9.3.1 The IRI report on Bangladesh’s LGBTI community noted that ‘Although Section 377 is not commonly enforced, it has been used to arrest or harass mostly gay and bisexual men. Hijras avoid punishment under Article 377 because of a widely held misunderstanding about their sexual identity.’[footnote 49] However, the same report added that, because of the criminalisation of same-sex sexual activity, ‘… many in the LGBTI community live in fear of arrest.’[footnote 50]
9.3.2 According to the USSD HR Report 2022, some LGBTI persons were harassed by police, and LGBTI advocacy groups stated that police used the law as grounds to harass people who were, or were perceived to be, LGBTI[footnote 51]. The DFAT report similarly noted that ‘Police use [Section 377] to harass men perceived to be effeminate. Laws against pornography, drug or alcohol offences are often used to target gay men. Harassment includes using the Penal Code as leverage to extort bribes from individuals under threat of arrest…’[footnote 52] The IRI report stated that ‘Many participants said the police sexually assault gay and bisexual men and transgender women.’[footnote 53]
9.3.3 ILGA reported that, according to information provided by LGBTI rights groups, ‘In late October 2020 the RAB [Rapid Action Battalion] arrested two young lesbian women in Patuakhali in a raid. The pair met online and fled their homes to live together in peace, but the family of one of the pair alerted police to an “abduction” and both were taken in for investigation.’[footnote 54] The Daily Bangladesh also reported the story, stating that the couple, who were teenagers, admitted to running away and getting ‘married’[footnote 55]. Further information could not be found amongst the sources consulted by CPIT (see Bibliography).
9.3.4 The USSD HR Report 2022 stated that ‘Some groups also reported harassment under a suspicious-behavior provision of the police code.’[footnote 56] The same report noted that ‘Transgender rights advocates claimed the government conducted genitalia checks on hijra in some cases, before allowing them access to services.’[footnote 57]
9.4 Police and judicial response to violence against LGBTI persons
9.4.1 The USSD HR Report 2022 stated that ‘The government took few official actions to investigate, prosecute, and punish those complicit in violence and abuses against LGBTQI+ persons.’[footnote 58]
9.4.2 On 31 August 2021, national media reported that 6 members of the banned Islamic group, Ansar al-Islam, were sentenced to death by an anti-terrorism court for the murders of LGBTI rights activists, Xulhaz Mannan and Mahbub Rabby Tonoy, who were hacked to death in their apartment in Dhaka in April 2016[footnote 59] [footnote 60]. Al Jazeera noted that ‘The attack on the two activists was among a series of assassinations of secular activists, bloggers, academics and religious minorities perpetrated by the Ansar al-Islam group between 2013 and 2016.’[footnote 61] According to the DFAT report of November 2022, ‘The court acknowledged that the crime was motivated by hatred of gay people.’[footnote 62]
9.4.3 For more information on the murders of Xulhaz Mannan and Mahbub Tonoy, see the Country Policy and Information Note Bangladesh: Sexual orientation and gender identity and expression, April 2020. For information on the treatment of secularists and bloggers in Bangladesh see the Country Policy and Information Notes on Religious minorities and atheists, and Journalists, publishers and internet bloggers.
section updated: 20 June 2023
10. Societal treatment and attitudes
10.1 Societal norms and acceptance
10.1.1 The IRI report on Bangladesh’s LGBTI community, noted that ‘While Hijras can openly express their identity, other sexual and gender minorities cannot. In Bangladesh’s conservative and religious society, nonnormative sexual orientations are widely considered unacceptable.’[footnote 63] The same report stated that ‘While a small number of FGD [focus group discussion] participants came out to their families and have been embraced, most participants have suffered physical abuse, rejection and ridicule from their families or feared their family’s reaction if they came out.’[footnote 64] The report added ‘The intersection of religiosity and family honor forced many participants into a tenuous agreement with their families to hide their sexual or gender orientation in public.’[footnote 65]
10.1.2 An article published in January 2023, reporting on research into ‘heteronormative “straightening devices” – mechanisms working to direct people towards heterosexuality, gender conformity, and procreative marriage…’, undertaken in 2019 in Dhaka with 46 interviewees aged 18 to 24, 14 of whom self-identified as LGBTI, found that ‘Heteronormative expectations were apparent in participants’ narratives around gender norms of traditional masculine/feminine behaviour and presentation for men and women as well as compulsory heterosexuality through marriage (as expected by parents).’[footnote 66]
10.1.3 In a 2020 survey of 300 people, which asked participants whether Bangladesh society was tolerant towards LGBTI persons, 81% said no[footnote 67].
10.1.4 The DFAT report of November 2022 noted that ‘Male same-sex relationships are taboo but there is a general lack of awareness of female same-sex relationships. Almost all LGBTI people in Bangladesh keep their sexual orientation or gender identity secret. There is strong family and social pressure on gay men and lesbians to enter heterosexual marriages.’[footnote 68]
10.2 Violence, harassment and discrimination – overview
10.2.1 The IRI report noted that:
‘The vast majority of FGD participants said Bangladeshi society does not accept the LGBTI community… In the survey, over 50 percent of respondents said they faced discrimination, physical violence, mental torture, verbal harassment and sexual harassment. Other commonly cited challenges included social stigma, bullying, sexual violence, threats, stalking and extortion. Forty-five percent of respondents said they faced “discrimination, violence or harassment” almost every day or at least once a week. Transgender and Hijra respondents reported the most frequent discrimination.’[footnote 69]
10.2.2 Respondents in the IRI survey said who the primary perpetrators of violence against LGBTI persons were:
If you face violence because of sexual identity, who is the primary perpetrator? (multiple responses permitted)
Community members: 75%
Family members: 61%
Mastan (local ‘musclemen’): 40%
Religious leaders: 37%
Police: 35%
Political-party members: 18%
Employers: 18%
Teachers: 15%
Others: 8%
I do not face violence: 5%
Refused to answer: 1%
Table source[footnote 70]
10.2.3 Following a country visit to Bangladesh from 31 October to 9 November 2022, Siobhán Mullally, the UN Special Rapporteur on trafficking in persons expressed concern about ‘… the continuing prevalence of discrimination, harassment and violence against lesbian, gay, bisexual and trans groups and persons of diverse gender identities, which increase the risks of serious human rights violations, in particular through trafficking for purposes of sexual exploitation.’[footnote 71]
10.2.4 Claudi Mahler, UN Independent Expert on the enjoyment of all human rights by older persons, gave her preliminary findings following a visit to Bangladesh in November 2022, noting that:
‘During my meetings with LGBTI older persons and civil society representatives, I was informed that older transgender women, also called Hijra, can openly express their identity. However, this does not apply for other sexual and gender minorities. Older LGBTI persons are facing discrimination, social rejection, harassment, assault and hate. The lack of family and community support may lead to depression of older LGBTI persons.’[footnote 72]
10.2.5 HRW stated in its 2022 annual report, covering the human rights situation in 2021, that ‘… lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender people and advocates continued to face violence and threats of violence without adequate protection from the police.’[footnote 73] HRW repeated this assertion in its report covering events in 2022[footnote 74].
10.2.6 Freedom House noted in its Freedom in the World 2023 report, covering 2022 events, that ‘… societal discrimination [against LGBTI people] remains the norm, and LGBT+ individuals are regularly attacked. A number of LGBT+ individuals remain in exile after Islamist militants murdered LGBT+ activist Xulhaz Mannan in 2016.’[footnote 75] The DFAT report stated ‘LGBTI people must be very security aware; threats against them, including by religious extremists, are common.’[footnote 76]
10.2.7 For more information on the murder of Xulhaz Mannan, see the Country Policy and Information Note Bangladesh: Sexual orientation and gender identity and expression, April 2020.
10.2.8 Shahanur Islam, human rights defender, lawyer, and founder of human rights group, JusticeMakers Bangladesh (JMB), which called for the decriminalisation of Section 377 of the penal code[footnote 77], received repeated death threats for his advocacy of LGBTI rights, reported the Bangladesh Institute for Human Rights (BIHR)[footnote 78]. The threats, against Shahanur and his family, were received from unidentified numbers via SMS on his mobile phone in August and September 2022[footnote 79]. In another report, BIHR noted that president of the Council of Bars and Law Societies of Europe (CCBE) wrote to Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina in October 2022, calling for the protection of Shahanur, who has been receiving threats to his life since 2016[footnote 80].
10.2.9 Shahanur wrote in his blog, dated 1 April 2023, that:
‘Violence against the LGBT community is a prevalent and widespread phenomenon in Bangladesh. It takes many forms, including murder, physical assault, threats, death threats, rape, sexual abuse, extortion, bullying, social stigma, discrimination, deprivation, physical and psychological abuse. Unfortunately, most incidents go unreported due to stigma and intolerance from families, society, and the state, as well as existing discriminatory laws that criminalize same-sex activities and impose sentences of up to life imprisonment.’[footnote 81]
See also Legal context and Police and judicial response to violence against LGBTI persons.
10.3 Conversion therapy
10.3.1 The USSD HR Report 2022 noted that ‘LGBTQI+ activists reported so-called conversion therapy practices were widespread. Lesbian women and gay men recounted stories of being sent by their parents to drug rehabilitation facilities and forced to take sedatives, wear traditional clothing, and recite the Quran. One community leader spoke of her parents sending her to a psychiatrist to “turn her straight.” The government took no measures to condemn these practices.’[footnote 82]
10.3.2 Lawyer Shahanur Islam stated similar in his blog, writing that ‘Conversion therapy, the practice of attempting to change an individual’s sexual orientation or gender identity, is still widespread. Lesbian and gay individuals may be sent to drug rehabilitation facilities, forced to wear traditional clothing, and recite religious texts. The government has yet to condemn these practices…’[footnote 83]
10.3.3 In 2020, the UN Expert on Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity, Victor Madrigal-Borloz, stated that conversion therapies were ‘“inherently discriminatory, that they are cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment, and that depending on the severity or physical or mental pain and suffering inflicted to the victim, they may amount to torture.”’[footnote 84]
10.4 Gay and bisexual men
10.4.1 The IRI report found that gay and bisexual men were victims of extortion: ‘Several participants described being lured to an isolated location under the guise of a relationship, only to be assaulted and blackmailed.’[footnote 85]
10.4.2 On 9 October 2022, JMB and BIHR released a joint statement condemning the assault and blackmail of a gay teenager. The statement, which the JMB/BIHR said was reported on Bangladesh news channel, DBS News, stated that the teenager was lured to a house in Dhaka after meeting the accused on Facebook. The police arrested 3 people in relation to the case[footnote 86].
10.4.3 JMB reported on the murder of a bisexual man in Dhaka in March 2023 after he refused to pay blackmailers. According to the report cited by LGBTI rights group, Erasing 76 Crimes, architect Imtiaz Mohammad Bhuiyan met a man on the gay dating app, Grindr, and went to his apartment where he was filmed in a compromising position by a group of men who demanded money, which he refused to pay. Imtiaz was apparently beaten to death and his body dumped. Police arrested 3 people in relation to the attack[footnote 87].
10.4.4 JMB reported that a gay Islamic leader was stabbed to death in his home on 20 April 2023. The report noted that ‘According to reliable sources, Jalali was stabbed to death by his juvenile assistant, Quarnic Hafiz Hasan Ahmed, who has since been arrested by the police. The accused claimed that he stabbed Jalali after an argument about his pay.’[footnote 88]
10.4.5 Corroborating or further information on the above reports by JMB could not be found amongst the sources consulted by CPIT (see Bibliography)
10.5 Lesbians and bisexual women
10.5.1 A report by Global Human Rights Defence (GHRD) on LGBTI rights in Bangladesh, dated June 2022 and based on a range of sources, noted that:
‘The general lack of societal awareness about lesbianism leads to social invisibility, and information about lesbians in Bangladesh is quite inexistent. Lesbians are unlikely to be open about their sexual identity, as doing so would make them highly vulnerable to societal violence. The position of lesbian and bisexual women should also be viewed in the context of the general position of women in Bangladeshi society, where women fear gender-based violence just for being women. Although there are multiple women’s movements, they face barriers to reassert their independence.’[footnote 89]
10.5.2 According to the DFAT report, dated November 2022:
‘As with all women, LGBTI women are less likely than men to have social and economic independence. LGBTI women are pressured to enter heterosexual marriages in which the male partner of the relationship would exercise considerable social control and “protection” over a woman, preventing any real prospect of her self-expression. Many girls are married young, limiting avenues for expression of sexuality and gender identity outside the norm.’[footnote 90]
10.5.3 In a joint statement dated 22 September 2022, BIHR and JMB expressed their concern at the harassment of 4 lesbians in the district of Jamalpur. The statement noted that, according to media reports, published on 21 September 2022, ‘… a girl married another girl in Hatbari village of Doyle Union in Sarishabari, Jamalpur. Local peoples have handed over two young girls and their two accomplices to the police on charges of same-sex marriage.’ Furthermore, ‘… interviews of the two young girls were taken in presence of hundreds of local people…’, which lawyer Shahanur Islam argued violated their right to privacy[footnote 91].
10.5.4 On 28 September 2022, the BIHR and JMB reported on another case of a lesbian couple who came to Tangail city (central Bangladesh) Kazi (registry) office to get married. Upon hearing of the incident, local residents gathered at the office and staff reported the couple’s intentions to the police, who then came and took them to the police station[footnote 92].
10.5.5 Corroborating or further information on the above reports by JMB/BIHR could not be found amongst the sources consulted by CPIT (see Bibliography).
10.5.6 For information on the general position and treatment of women in Bangladesh, see the Country Policy and Information Report on Bangladesh: Women fearing gender-based violence.
10.6 Trans persons, including hijras
10.6.1 The USSD HR Report 2022 stated that:
‘While some transgender women in the country identified as hijra (a cultural South Asian term for some transgender women as well as some intersex and gender nonconforming individuals) due to an affinity for the hijra subculture or a desire for increased social protection, not all chose to do so. Many transgender women asserted their transgender identities and corrected those that identified them as hijra. Meanwhile, transgender men received little support or tolerance, particularly in poor and rural communities. Some conservative clerics decried the transgender community and sharply distinguished it from the hijra identity, saying the latter would be tolerable while the former remains unacceptable.’[footnote 93]
10.6.2 The DFAT report of November 2022 noted ‘Acceptance of hijra family members among relatives is generally low…’[footnote 94]
10.6.3 Human rights defender and lawyer, Shahanur Islam, stated in April 2023 that ‘Transgender individuals, in particular, face unique challenges. Some may identify as hijra, seeking social protection or an affinity for the subculture, while others assert their transgender identities and reject the hijra label. Transgender men, however, often receive little support or tolerance, especially in poorer and more rural areas.’[footnote 95]
10.6.4 In November 2021, Al Jazeera reported that a rural town elected a hijra to become the country’s first transgender mayor[footnote 96].
10.6.5 In November 2022, JMB (cited by Erasing 76 Crimes) reported on the election victory of a transwoman to a local council. According to news published by Voice of America’s Bengali section online on 4 November 2022, Payal Khatun, a transgender woman was elected as a member of the Union Parishad in Kushtia district of Bangladesh and was the first elected public representative of the third gender in Kushtia district. Payal was elected as after receiving 1,623 votes[footnote 97].
10.6.6 In March 2021, a private satellite television channel, Boishakhi Television, appointed the country’s first trans news anchor[footnote 98] [footnote 99].
section updated: 20 June 2023
11. Access to, and treatment in, services
11.1 Overview
11.1.1 Respondents in the IRI survey cited multiple types of discrimination faced by LGBTI persons[footnote 100]:
What, if any, forms of discrimination do LGBTIQ individuals face because of their sexual identity? (multiple responses permitted)
Access to jobs: 71%
Access to medical care: 62%
Access to education: 62%
Property inheritance: 53%
Others: 6%
LGBTI persons do not face discrimination: 3%
Don’t know/refused to answer: 7%
11.1.2 The same report added that ‘More rarely mentioned forms of intolerance included landlord discrimination, workplace harassment, exclusion from social events and denial of religious burial services.’[footnote 101]
11.1.3 Human rights defender, Shahanur Islam, stated in his blog dated 1 April 2023 that ‘… LGBTQI+ individuals frequently encounter discrimination in areas such as employment, housing, and access to government services, including healthcare and justice.’[footnote 102]
11.2 Education
11.2.1 The IRI report noted that:
‘In primary and secondary school and at university, LGBTI students face myriad challenges. Most common is bullying from peers and teachers, but other issues undermine their academic achievement and mental health. Two transgender men participants said they lost points for refusing to wear a sari during a presentation. A lesbian participant said a professor denied her thesis topic on LGBTI issues. A gay man said his friend was kicked out of university when administrators discovered his sexual orientation. Across groups, LGBTI people said textbooks do not discuss LGBTI issues and classroom discussion rarely broaches these topics.’[footnote 103]
11.2.2 The UN Development Programme (UNDP) published a report in December 2021 on economic growth and human development in Bangladesh, which stated that ‘Youth belonging to the transgender community, are often humiliated and harassed by their peers (equivalent) at educational institutions and are forced to leave early.’[footnote 104]
11.2.3 In November 2020, BBC News reported on the opening of a privately funded madrassa (Islamic school) in Dhaka, exclusively for hijras[footnote 105].
11.2.4 In October 2022, LGBTI rights group, Erasing 76 Crimes, reported that a gay teacher, Ramzan Ali, from a college near Dhaka had been barred from teaching after students boycotted his class because he was accused of a gay encounter with a student in 2008. Although the accusation was found to be true by the school board at the time, Ali challenged the case in court. Lawyer Shahanur Islam protested the teacher’s exclusion, noting he had not been convicted in a court of law[footnote 106]. Corroborating or further information could not be found amongst the sources consulted by CPIT (see Bibliography).
11.2.5 Reuters reported in February 2023 that, in an effort to raise awareness and foster acceptance, new textbooks featuring hijras were rolled out at the beginning of 2023 for millions of schoolchildren aged between 11 and 13. Reuters stated that ‘The textbook contains images of transgenders in respectable jobs, including a beautician, a development worker and an elected mayor, and the fictional story of a child who transitions, takes a female name and goes to live with a transgender community.’[footnote 107]
11.3 Employment
11.3.1 The IRI report stated that ‘It is often difficult for LGBTI people to get jobs. Employers often do not want to hire gay men, bisexuals or lesbians. Many transgender women live on the street and lack the education and skills to get jobs. Other participants said that if they receive a job, they encounter sexual harassment or bullying from their co-workers. Intersex people face a different challenge: Government jobs require an applicant to note their sex, which is impossible for them.’[footnote 108]
11.3.2 The UNDP December 2021 report noted ‘Discrimination in the workplace is faced by people of transgender communities. Lack of enforcement of laws for non-discrimination is a major weakness in this regard.’[footnote 109]
11.3.3 The DFAT report of November 2022 noted ‘While they have an established role in Bangladeshi society, hijra remain marginalised. Few mainstream employment options are open to hijra, and many obtain income through informal and sometimes criminal means, including extortion, performing at ceremonies, begging or sex work.’[footnote 110]
11.3.4 In June 2021, it was reported that, in an effort to boost social inclusion, the government had offered a tax rebate to companies where transgender people made up 10% of their workforce, or have at least 100 transgender staff members[footnote 111] [footnote 112].
11.4 Healthcare
11.4.1 The IRI report found that ‘When accessing healthcare, participants [of focus group discussions] faced various problems including sexual assault or harassment, refusal of treatment and ignorance about sexuality and sexually transmitted diseases.’[footnote 113]
11.4.2 According to a study by Prima Alam, as part of their doctoral research at the London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, that took place in 2019 amongst LGBTI individuals, published in January 2023 ‘… transgender and gay participants spoke of concerns around, and experiences of, being discriminated against by healthcare professionals. In terms of perceptions, queer participants were of the view that disclosing their sexuality/being “found” to be queer could result in discrimination from most healthcare providers. Most queer respondents, therefore, preferred to seek out LGBTQ + friendly doctors for sexual health issues.’[footnote 114]
11.4.3 In December 2021, The Business Standard reported on a local hospital, a one hour drive from Dhaka, that had a dedicated room for the treatment of trans people every Sunday after one of the doctors recognised the need for better services[footnote 115]. The report noted ‘The simple but bold initiative that unlocked health access to third gender people met with enormous appreciation by the marginalised group, broke the gender-related stereotype, and minimised the community relationship gap between the group and general people.’[footnote 116]
11.4.4 According to human rights defender, Shahanur Islam, writing in April 2023, ‘… Mental health care providers have been known to use language that shames LGBTQI+ individuals, while HIV testing and treatment continue to be stigmatized.’[footnote 117]
11.4.5 The USSD HR Report 2022 noted that:
‘Mental health care was a top concern, and according to [LGBTI] groups, mental health-care providers tended to use moralistic terms to shame LGBTQI+ persons. PrEP and PEP, preexposure and postexposure medications that prevent transmittal of HIV during sex, were available via a pilot project in Dhaka but not in the rest of the country. The government made HIV testing free, but stigma regarding testing and seeking treatment remained strong.’[footnote 118]
section updated: 20 June 2023
12. LGBTI community
12.1 Living openly
12.1.1 The DFAT report, dated November 2022, stated that the LGBTI community was hidden[footnote 119], and that ‘Almost all LGBTI people in Bangladesh keep their sexual orientation or gender identity secret.’[footnote 120]. The IRI report noted that sexual and gender minorities (apart from hijras) cannot freely express their sexual identity, particularly in public, and that ‘LGBTI people often hide their identity out of fear.’[footnote 121] As noted by GHRD, ‘Lesbians are unlikely to be open about their sexual identity, as doing so would make them highly vulnerable to societal violence.’[footnote 122]
12.2 NGOs and support
12.2.1 The USSD HR Report 2022 noted that:
‘Organizations working on LGBTQI+ topics in the country faced major hurdles to fund and implement projects due to their inability to register with the government as formal LGBTQI+ NGOs. To get around this challenge, some organizations registered as social services or diversity-focused NGOs. Other organizations choose to operate without registration, but they were then precluded from directly accepting foreign funding. Organizations specifically assisting lesbians continued to be rare. Severe social stigma regarding sexual orientation was common and prevented open discussion of the subject.’[footnote 123]
12.2.2 According to the DFAT report, dated November 2022:
‘Some limited services for LGBTI women (not transgender women, see below) exist, including a helpline for women. Social gatherings for LGBTI women do not exist publicly, though women communicate with each other using encrypted messaging services or social media. In general, the strong taboo against LGBTI people and patriarchal attitudes towards women generally lead to invisibility of LGBTI women and, as a result, information is difficult to obtain.’[footnote 124]
12.2.3 Organisations who support individuals and advocate for LGBTI rights include:
12.3 LGBTI spaces
12.3.1 Freedom House reported in its Freedom on the Net 2022, which covered the period June 2021 to May 2022 and cited various sources, that ‘Media outlets, social media platforms, blogs, and websites represent diverse interests within society. For example, LGBT+ people have turned to online platforms as a safe space to express their opinions and experiences in response to broad discrimination in the country. However, the overall environment in Bangladesh is hostile and dangerous for LGBT+ people: state discrimination is prevalent and there have been violent, sometimes fatal, attacks in recent years.’[footnote 125]
12.3.2 The USSD HR Report 2022 stated that ‘Members of LGBTQI+ communities received threatening messages via telephone, text, and social media… They stressed the need for online and physical security due to continued threats of physical violence.’[footnote 126]
12.3.3 The IRI report on Bangladesh’s LGBTI community noted that ‘Online, where LGTBI people can express themselves honestly under the cover of anonymity, participants [of the IRI focus groups] said pro-LGBTI blogs or Facebook posts are inundated with threats and negative comments. The participants said religion feeds this intolerance.’[footnote 127]
12.4 Pride events
12.4.1 According to their Twitter account, ‘Dhaka Pride is the only LGBTIQ+ Public Pride Event in Bangladesh, happening since 2021.’[footnote 128] Inclusive Bangladesh reported that the event occurred only online ‘[d]ue to the legal and social obstacles faced by the LGBTIQ+ community in Bangladesh…’[footnote 129]
Research methodology
The country of origin information (COI) in this note has been carefully selected in accordance with the general principles of COI research as set out in the Common EU [European Union] Guidelines for Processing Country of Origin Information (COI), April 2008, and the Austrian Centre for Country of Origin and Asylum Research and Documentation’s (ACCORD), Researching Country Origin Information – Training Manual, 2013. Namely, taking into account the COI’s relevance, reliability, accuracy, balance, currency, transparency and traceability.
All the COI included in the note was published or made publicly available on or before the ‘cut-off’ date(s). Any event taking place or report/article published after these date(s) is not included.
Sources and the information they provide are carefully considered before inclusion. Factors relevant to the assessment of the reliability of sources and information include:
-
the motivation, purpose, knowledge and experience of the source
-
how the information was obtained, including specific methodologies used
-
the currency and detail of information
-
whether the COI is consistent with and/or corroborated by other sources
Wherever possible, multiple sourcing is used and the COI compared and contrasted to ensure that it is accurate and balanced, and provides a comprehensive and up-to-date picture of the issues relevant to this note at the time of publication.
The inclusion of a source is not, however, an endorsement of it or any view(s) expressed.
Each piece of information is referenced in a footnote.
Full details of all sources cited and consulted in compiling the note are listed alphabetically in the bibliography.
Terms of Reference
A ‘Terms of Reference’ (ToR) is a broad outline of the issues relevant to the scope of this note and forms the basis for the country information.
The Home Office uses some standardised ToR, depending on the subject, and these are then adapted depending on the country concerned.
For this particular CPIN, the following topics were identified prior to drafting as relevant and on which research was undertaken:
-
Legal context
-
general anti-discrimination provisions (and inclusion or absence of reference to LGBTI persons)
-
same-sex sexual behaviour
-
same-sex couples, including civil union and marriage
-
gender reassignment/transition, and recognition of gender identity of trans persons
-
relevant significant court cases and caselaw
-
-
State attitudes and treatment
-
statements made by government figures and public officials
-
government policies/programmes that assist or discriminate against LGBTI persons
-
restrictions/enforcement of law against LGBTI organisations
-
other state treatment, such as harassment, blackmail, bribery, corrective therapy
-
access to public services
-
-
Societal attitudes and treatment
-
public opinion/views/surveys, including anti-LGBTI movements and public demonstrations
-
prevailing cultural and family attitudes to male/female relationships, family and non-conforming behaviour
-
religious group attitudes, statements and actions
-
media representation, language and discourse
-
treatment by the public, including family members
-
-
LGBTI people and their lives
-
LGBTI organisations (including possibility to operate openly)
-
Meeting places and events for LGBTI persons.
-
Bibliography
Sources cited
Alam, P, Marston, C, ‘“Bending” against straightening devices: queer lived experiences of sexuality and sexual health in Bangladesh’ BMC Public Health 23, 173, 2023. Last accessed: 13 June 2023
Al Jazeera,
‘Six sentenced to death in Bangladesh for killing LGBTQ activists’, 31 August 2021. Last accessed: 12 June 2023
‘Tax rebate for Bangladesh companies hiring transgender people’, 4 June 2021. Last accessed: 16 June 2023
Anjum H and others, ‘Ensuring Human Rights for the Gender Diverse Population in Bangladesh: The Protection Perspectives’, Beijing Law Review volume 12, June 2021. Last accessed: 19 June 2023
Australian Government, Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade (DFAT), ‘Country Information Report Bangladesh’, November 2022. Last accessed: 6 June 2023
Bangladesh Institute for Human Rights (BIHR),
‘Bangladeshi activist Shahanur has received repeated death threats!’, 20 September 2022. Last accessed: 14 June 2023
‘European attorneys seek protection for LGBTQ activist Bangladeshi lawyer’, 10 November 2022. Last accessed: 14 June 2023
‘Human rights organizations BIHR and JusticeMakers Bangladesh are concerned over the handover of two lesbian girls to the police station in Tangail’, 28 September 2022. Last accessed: 16 June 2023
Bangladesh Legal Aid and Services Trust (BLAST), ‘From Recognition to Realising Rights: Legal Protection of Gender Identity in Bangladesh Law’, December 2019. Last accessed: 1 June 2023
Bangladesh Sangbad Sangstha (BSS), ‘A bill titled “Anti-Discrimination act-2022” placed in parliament’, 5 April 2022. Last accessed: 6 June 2023
BBC News,
‘Blurring the gender lines in Bangladesh’, 30 November 2000. Last accessed: 1 June 2023
‘Transgender in Bangladesh: First school opens for trans students’, 6 November 2020. Last accessed: 5 June 2023
bdnews24,
‘Bangladesh pitches sweeping new anti-discrimination bill to uphold equality’, 5 April 2022. Last accessed: 6 June 2023
‘Court sentences six to death for murders of LGBT activist Xulhaz, friend Tonoy’, 31 August 2021. Last accessed: 12 June 2023
The Business Standard, ‘Once denied treatment, now welcomed – ‘Room 110’ shows the way’, 18 December 2021. Last accessed: 14 June 2023
Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), ‘The World Factbook, Bangladesh’, updated 8 June 2023. Last accessed: 16 June 2023
Daily Bangladesh,
‘2 lesbian teenager arrested in Patuakhali’, 28 October 2020. Last accessed: 16 June 2023
‘Country’s first transgender TV news anchor appointed’, 5 March 2021. Last accessed: 16 June 2023
The Daily Star,
‘Breaking the glass ceiling: Shishir first transgender newscaster in Bangladesh’, 5 March 2021. Last accessed: 16 June 2023
‘The twisted plight of Bangladeshi transgender community’, 11 June 2022. Last accessed: 6 June 2023
Dhaka Tribune,
‘Make anti-discrimination law more inclusive, says think tank’, 10 April 2022. Last accessed: 6 June 2023
‘Members of the third gender can vote as “hijra”’, 19 April 2019. Last accessed: 5 June 2023
‘Six militants awarded death penalty for murdering LGBT activists Xulhaz, Tonoy’, 31 August 2021. Last accessed: 12 June 2023
Erasing 76 Crimes,
‘Activists demand justice for murder of bisexual man in Bangladesh’, 17 April 2023. Last accessed: 14 June 2023
‘Bangladesh LGBT activists call for repeal of gay sex laws’, 15 May 2023. Last accessed: 13 June 2023
Bangladesh: Trans woman elected to government council’, 19 November 2022. Last accessed: 14 June 2023
‘Gay teacher barred from teaching in Bangladesh’, 18 October 2022. Last accessed: 14 June 2023
European Union Asylum Agency (EUAA), ‘Country of Origin Information Research Guide on LGBTIQ’, February 2023. Last accessed: 5 June 2023
Freedom House,
‘Freedom in the World 2023: Bangladesh’, 2023. Last accessed: 7 June 2023
‘Freedom on the Net 2022’, 18 October 2022. Last accessed: 5 June 2023
Global Human Rights Defence (GHRD), ‘LGBTQ+ Rights in Bangladesh’, June 2022. Last accessed: 6 June 2023
Human Dignity Trust, ‘Country profile: Bangladesh’, n/d. Last accessed: 1 June 2023
Human Rights Watch (HRW),
‘Bangladesh: Protests Erupt Over Rape Case’, 9 October 2020. Last accessed: 5 June 2023
‘“I Want to Live With My Head Held High”: Abuses in Bangladesh’s Legal Recognition of Hijras’, 23 December 2016. Last accessed: 6 June 2023
‘World Report 2022’, 13 January 2022. Last accessed: 16 June 2023
‘World Report 2023’, 12 January 2023. Last accessed: 16 June 2023
Inclusive Bangladesh, ‘Dhaka Pride: Pride2Power’,n/d. Last accessed: 16 June 2023
The International Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Trans and Intersex Association (ILGA),
‘Our Identities under Arrest’, 15 December 2021. Last accessed: 13 June 2023
‘State Sponsored Homophobia 2017’, May 2017. Last accessed: 1 June 2023
‘State-Sponsored Homophobia 2019’, March 2019. Last accessed: 1 June 2023
‘State-Sponsored Homophobia 2020’, December 2020. Last accessed: 31 May 2023.
International Republican Institute (IRI),
‘About IRI’, no date. Last accessed: 8 June 2023
‘Understanding the Lives of Bangladesh’s LGBTI Community’, 8 April 2021. Last accessed: 8 June 2023
JusticeMakers Bangladesh (JMB),
‘JOINT STATEMENT: BIHR and JusticeMakers Bangladesh are concerned over the harassment of four lesbian girls at Jamalpur’, 22 September 2022. Last accessed: 14 June 2023
‘JOINT STATEMENT: BIHR and JusticeMakers Bangladesh are deeply concerned over physical assault against a sexual minority homosexual gay teenager boy in Dhaka’, 9 October 2022, Last accessed: 16 June 2023
‘Statement: JusticeMakers Bangladesh Condemns Murder of Gay Islamic Religious Leader in Dhaka’, 26 April 2023. Last accessed: 14 June 2023
Kaleidoscope Australia, ‘Parallel Report to the Committee on the Elimination of all Forms of Discrimination Against Women regarding Bangladesh’s Protection of the Rights of LBTI women’, September 2016. Last accessed: 1 June 2023
Laws of Bangladesh,
‘The Constitution of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh’, 1972. Last accessed: 31 May 2023
‘The Penal Code’, 6 October 1860. Last accessed: 31 May 2023
Nanda, S, ‘Neither Man nor Woman, the Hijras of India’, 1999. Last accessed: 1 June 2023
Reuters,
‘Firms hiring transgender staff could get tax breaks in Bangladesh’, 3 June 2021. Last accessed: 16 June 2023
‘In Bangladesh, new school textbook features transgender people’, 24 February 2023. Last accessed: 6 June 2023
Shahanur, I, ‘How can society promote equality and respect for LGBTQI+ rights in Bangladesh?’, 1 April 2023. Last accessed: 13 June 2023
Twitter, ‘Dhaka Pride (@dhkpride) / Twitter’, joined November 2022. Last accessed: 16 June 2023
UK Home Office, ‘Report of a Home Office Fact-Finding Mission to Bangladesh’, conducted 14 to 26 May 2017’, September 2017. Last accessed: 1 June 2023
UN Development Programme (UNDP), ‘Advancing Human Development in Bangladesh’, December 2021. Last accessed: 5 June 2023
UN Human Rights Council (UNHRC), ‘Visit to Bangladesh Report of the Special Rapporteur on trafficking in persons, especially women and children, Siobhán Mullally [A/HRC/53/28/Add.1]’, 28 April 2023. Last accessed: 5 June 2023
UN Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR),
‘“Conversion therapy” can amount to torture and should be banned says UN expert’, 13 June 2020. Last accessed: 7 June 2023
‘End of mission statement by Mr. Olivier De Schutter Special Rapporteur on extreme poverty and human rights; Visit to Bangladesh, 17-29 May 2023’, 29 May 2023. Last accessed: 7 June 2023
‘Preliminary findings and recommendations from the United Nations Independent Expert on the enjoyment of all human rights by older persons, Dr. Claudia Mahler, at the end of her official visit to Bangladesh’, 17 November 2022. Last accessed: 16 June 2023
US Department of State (USSD), ‘2022 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: Bangladesh’, 20 March 2023. Last accessed: 6 June 2023
Sources consulted but not cited
Amanullah ASM, Abir T, and others, ‘Human rights violations and associated factors of the Hijras in Bangladesh—A cross-sectional study’, 7 July 2022. Last accessed: 14 June 2023
The Daily Star, ‘The Problem with Straight Intentions’, 17 July 2019. Last accessed: 16 June 2023
Institute of Development Studies, ‘Working Paper; Volume 2022 Number 569; Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights (SRHR) and Maternal, Neonatal and Child Health (MNCH) in Bangladesh: Impacts of the Covid-19 Pandemic’, May 2022. Last accessed: 16 June 2023
Karim, S, ‘Women and Sexualities: the troubles of discussing women’s sexual rights’, 1 August 2020. Last accessed: 13 June 2023
UCLA Williams Institutes, ‘Global Acceptance Index’, November 2021. Last accessed: 11 June 2023
US Department of State, ‘2023 Trafficking in Persons Report: Bangladesh’, June 2023. Last accessed: 19 June 2023
Version control and feedback
Clearance
Below is information on when this note was cleared:
-
version 5.0
-
valid from 5 September 2023
Official – sensitive: Not for disclosure – Start of section
The information on this page has been removed as it is restricted for internal Home Office use.
Official – sensitive: Not for disclosure – End of section
Changes from last version of this note
Updated country information and assessment
Feedback to the Home Office
Our goal is to provide accurate, reliable and up-to-date COI and clear guidance. We welcome feedback on how to improve our products. If you would like to comment on this note, please email the Country Policy and Information Team.
Independent Advisory Group on Country Information
The Independent Advisory Group on Country Information (IAGCI) was set up in March 2009 by the Independent Chief Inspector of Borders and Immigration to support him in reviewing the efficiency, effectiveness and consistency of approach of COI produced by the Home Office.
The IAGCI welcomes feedback on the Home Office’s COI material. It is not the function of the IAGCI to endorse any Home Office material, procedures or policy. The IAGCI may be contacted at:
Independent Advisory Group on Country Information
Independent Chief Inspector of Borders and Immigration
1st Floor
Clive House
70 Petty France
London
SW1H 9EX
Email: [email protected]
Information about the IAGCI’s work and a list of the documents which have been reviewed by the IAGCI can be found on the Independent Chief Inspector’s pages of the gov.uk website.
-
EUAA, ‘Country of Origin Information Research Guide on LGBTIQ’ (pages 17, 18), February 2023 ↩
-
DFAT, ‘Country Information Report Bangladesh’ (paragraph 3.124), November 2022 ↩
-
Laws of Bangladesh, ‘The Constitution of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh’, 1972 ↩
-
ILGA, ‘State-Sponsored Homophobia 2020’ (page 327), December 2020 ↩
-
BSS, ‘A bill titled “Anti-Discrimination act-2022” placed in parliament’, 5 April 2022 ↩
-
bdnews24, ‘Bangladesh pitches sweeping new anti-discrimination bill to uphold…’, 5 April 2022 ↩
-
OHCHR, ‘End of mission statement by Mr. Olivier De Schutter Special Rapporteur…’, 29 May 2023 ↩
-
Dhaka Tribune, ‘Make anti-discrimination law more inclusive, says think tank’, 10 April 2022 ↩
-
Laws of Bangladesh, ‘The Penal Code’ (Section 377), 6 October 1860 ↩
-
Human Dignity Trust, ‘Country profile: Bangladesh’, no date ↩
-
ILGA, ‘State-Sponsored Homophobia 2019’ (pages 50 and 172), March 2019 ↩
-
Laws of Bangladesh, ‘The Penal Code’ (Section 377), 6 October 1860 ↩
-
HRW, ‘Bangladesh: Protests Erupt Over Rape Case’, 9 October 2020 ↩
-
Nanda. S., ‘Neither Man nor Woman…’ (Chapter 2), 1999 ↩
-
BBC News, ‘Blurring the gender lines in Bangladesh’, 30 November 2000 ↩
-
Nanda. S., ‘Neither Man nor Woman…’ (Chapter 2), 1999 ↩
-
BBC News, ‘Blurring the gender lines in Bangladesh’, 30 November 2000 ↩
-
Nanda. S., ‘Neither Man nor Woman…’ (Chapter 2), 1999 ↩
-
BBC News, ‘Blurring the gender lines in Bangladesh’, 30 November 2000 ↩
-
Nanda. S., ‘Neither Man nor Woman…’ (Introduction and Chapter 2), 1999 ↩
-
BBC News, ‘Blurring the gender lines in Bangladesh’, 30 November 2000 ↩
-
BBC, ‘The semi-sacred “third gender” of South Asia’, 20 July 2017 ↩
-
Home Office, ‘FFM to Bangladesh’ (paragraph 7.4.1), September 2017 ↩
-
Kaleidoscope Australia, ‘Parallel Report to the CEDAW’ (paragraph 4.2), September 2016 ↩
-
Nanda. S., ‘Neither Man nor Woman…’ (Chapter 2), 1999 ↩
-
Nanda. S., ‘Neither Man nor Woman…’ (Chapter 2), 1999 ↩
-
BBC News, ‘Blurring the gender lines in Bangladesh’, 30 November 2000 ↩
-
The Daily Star, ‘The twisted plight of Bangladeshi transgender community’, 11 June 2022 ↩
-
BBC News, ‘Blurring the gender lines in Bangladesh’, 30 November 2000 ↩
-
ILGA, ‘State Sponsored Homophobia 2017’ (page 121), May 2017 ↩
-
BLAST, ‘From Recognition to Realising Rights: Legal Protection…’ (page 2), December 2019 ↩
-
BLAST, ‘From Recognition to Realising Rights: Legal Protection…’ (page 2), December 2019 ↩
-
HRW, ‘“I Want to Live With My Head Held High”…’, 23 December 2016 ↩
-
Dhaka Tribune, ‘Members of the third gender can vote as “hijra”’, 19 April 2019 ↩
-
BLAST, ‘From Recognition to Realising Rights: Legal Protection…’ (page 2), December 2019 ↩
-
BLAST, ‘From Recognition to Realising Rights: Legal Protection…’ (page 5), December 2019 ↩
-
BLAST, ‘From Recognition to Realising Rights: Legal Protection…’ (page 6), December 2019 ↩
-
DFAT, ‘Country Information Report Bangladesh’ (paragraph 3.127), November 2022 ↩
-
Nanda. S., ‘Neither Man nor Woman…’ (Introduction and Chapter 2), 1999 ↩
-
IRI, ‘Understanding the Lives of Bangladesh’s LGBTI Community’ (page 3), 8 April 2021 ↩
-
IRI, ‘Understanding the Lives of Bangladesh’s LGBTI Community’ (page 2), 8 April 2021 ↩
-
ILGA, ‘State-Sponsored Homophobia 2020’ (page 327), December 2020 ↩
-
USSD, ‘2022 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices’ (section 6), 20 March 2023 ↩
-
USSD, ‘2022 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices’ (section 6), 20 March 2023 ↩
-
DFAT, ‘Country Information Report Bangladesh’ (paragraph 3.122), November 2022 ↩
-
DFAT, ‘Country Information Report Bangladesh’ (paragraph 3.126), November 2022 ↩
-
ILGA, ‘Our Identities under Arrest’ (page 144), 15 December 2021 ↩
-
IRI, ‘Understanding the Lives of Bangladesh’s LGBTI Community’ (page 2), 8 April 2021 ↩
-
IRI, ‘Understanding the Lives of Bangladesh’s LGBTI Community’ (page 13), 8 April 2021 ↩
-
USSD, ‘2022 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices’ (section 6), 20 March 2023 ↩
-
DFAT, ‘Country Information Report Bangladesh’ (paragraph 3.122), November 2022 ↩
-
IRI, ‘Understanding the Lives of Bangladesh’s LGBTI Community’ (page 14), 8 April 2021 ↩
-
ILGA, ‘Our Identities under Arrest’ (page 144), 15 December 2021 ↩
-
Daily Bangladesh, ‘2 lesbian teenager arrested in Patuakhali’, 28 October 2020 ↩
-
USSD, ‘2022 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices’ (section 6), 20 March 2023 ↩
-
USSD, ‘2022 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices’ (section 6), 20 March 2023 ↩
-
USSD, ‘2022 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices’ (section 6), 20 March 2023 ↩
-
bdnews24, ‘Court sentences six to death for murders of LGBT activist Xulhaz…’, 31 August 2021 ↩
-
Dhaka Tribune, ‘Six militants awarded death penalty for murdering LGBT…’, 31 August 2021 ↩
-
Al Jazeera, ‘Six sentenced to death in Bangladesh for killing LGBTQ activists’, 31 August 2021 ↩
-
DFAT, ‘Country Information Report Bangladesh’ (paragraph 3.123), November 2022 ↩
-
IRI, ‘Understanding the Lives of Bangladesh’s LGBTI Community’ (page 1), 8 April 2021 ↩
-
IRI, ‘Understanding the Lives of Bangladesh’s LGBTI Community’ (page 5), 8 April 2021 ↩
-
IRI, ‘Understanding the Lives of Bangladesh’s LGBTI Community’ (page 6), 8 April 2021 ↩
-
Alam, P, Marston, C, ‘“Bending” against straightening devices: queer lived experiences…’ 2023 ↩
-
Anjum H and others, ‘Ensuring Human Rights for the Gender Diverse Population…’, 2021 ↩
-
DFAT, ‘Country Information Report Bangladesh’ (paragraph 3.121), November 2022 ↩
-
IRI, ‘Understanding the Lives of Bangladesh’s LGBTI Community’ (page 8), 8 April 2021 ↩
-
IRI, ‘Understanding the Lives of Bangladesh’s LGBTI Community’ (pages 9 and 10), 8 April 2021 ↩
-
UNHRC, ‘Report of the Special Rapporteur on trafficking…’ (paragraph 43), 28 April 2023 ↩
-
OHCHR, ‘Preliminary findings and recommendations…’ (page 8), 17 November 2022 ↩
-
HRW, ‘World Report 2022: Bangladesh’, 13 January 2022 ↩
-
HRW, ‘World Report 2023: Bangladesh’, 12 January 2023 ↩
-
Freedom House, ‘Freedom in the World 2023: Bangladesh’ (F4), 2023 ↩
-
DFAT, ‘Country Information Report Bangladesh’ (paragraph 3.121), November 2022 ↩
-
Erasing 76 Crimes, ‘Bangladesh LGBT activists call for repeal of gay sex laws’, 15 May 2023 ↩
-
BIHR, ‘Bangladeshi activist Shahanur has received repeated death threats!’, 20 September 2022 ↩
-
BIHR, ‘Bangladeshi activist Shahanur has received repeated death threats!’, 20 September 2022 ↩
-
BIHR, ‘European attorneys seek protection for LGBTQ activist Bangladeshi…’, 10 November 2022 ↩
-
Shahanur, I, ‘How can society promote equality and respect for LGBTQI+ rights…’, 1 April 2023 ↩
-
USSD, ‘2022 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices’ (section 6), 20 March 2023 ↩
-
Shahanur, I, ‘How can society promote equality and respect for LGBTQI+ rights…’, 1 April 2023 ↩
-
OHCHR, ‘‘Conversion therapy’ can amount to torture and should be banned…’, 13 June 2020 ↩
-
IRI, ‘Understanding the Lives of Bangladesh’s LGBTI Community’ (page 10), 8 April 2021 ↩
-
JMB, ‘JOINT STATEMENT: BIHR and JusticeMakers Bangladesh are deeply…’, 9 October 2022 ↩
-
Erasing 76 Crimes, ‘Activists demand justice for murder of bisexual man in…’, 17 April 2023 ↩
-
JMB, ‘Statement: JusticeMakers Bangladesh Condemns Murder of Gay Islamic…’, 26 April 2023 ↩
-
GHRD, ‘LGBTQ+ Rights in Bangladesh’ (page 13), June 2022 ↩
-
DFAT, ‘Country Information Report Bangladesh’ (paragraph 3.125), November 2022 ↩
-
JMB, ‘JOINT STATEMENT: BIHR and JusticeMakers Bangladesh…’, 22 September 2022 ↩
-
BIHR, ‘Human rights organizations BIHR and JusticeMakers Bangladesh…’, 28 September 2022 ↩
-
USSD, ‘2022 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices’ (section 6), 20 March 2023 ↩
-
DFAT, ‘Country Information Report Bangladesh’ (paragraph 3.127), November 2022 ↩
-
Shahanur, I, ‘How can society promote equality and respect for LGBTQI+ rights…’, 1 April 2023 ↩
-
Al Jazeera, ‘Bangladesh town elects country’s first transgender mayor’, 30 November 2021 ↩
-
Erasing 76 Crimes, ‘Bangladesh: Trans woman elected to government council’, 19 November 2022 ↩
-
Daily Bangladesh, ‘Country’s first transgender TV news anchor appointed’, 5 March 2021 ↩
-
Daily Star, ‘Breaking the glass ceiling: Shishir first transgender newscaster…’, 5 March 2021 ↩
-
IRI, ‘Understanding the Lives of Bangladesh’s LGBTI Community’ (page 11), 8 April 2021 ↩
-
IRI, ‘Understanding the Lives of Bangladesh’s LGBTI Community’ (page 11), 8 April 2021 ↩
-
Shahanur, I, ‘How can society promote equality and respect for LGBTQI+ rights…’, 1 April 2023 ↩
-
IRI, ‘Understanding the Lives of Bangladesh’s LGBTI Community’ (page 11), 8 April 2021 ↩
-
UNDP, ‘Advancing Human Development in Bangladesh’ (page 120), December 2021 ↩
-
BBC News, ‘Transgender in Bangladesh: First school opens for trans students’, 6 November 2020 ↩
-
Erasing 76 Crimes, ‘Gay teacher barred from teaching in Bangladesh’, 18 October 2022 ↩
-
Reuters, ‘In Bangladesh, new school textbook features transgender people’, 24 February 2023 ↩
-
IRI, ‘Understanding the Lives of Bangladesh’s LGBTI Community’ (page 11), 8 April 2021 ↩
-
UNDP, ‘Advancing Human Development in Bangladesh’ (page 122), December 2021 ↩
-
DFAT, ‘Country Information Report Bangladesh’ (paragraph 3.127), November 2022 ↩
-
Al Jazeera, ‘Tax rebate for Bangladesh companies hiring transgender people’, 4 June 2021 ↩
-
Reuters, ‘Firms hiring transgender staff could get tax breaks in Bangladesh’, 3 June 2021 ↩
-
IRI, ‘Understanding the Lives of Bangladesh’s LGBTI Community’ (page 12), 8 April 2021 ↩
-
Alam, P, Marston, C, ‘“Bending” against straightening devices: queer lived experiences…’, 2023 ↩
-
The Business Standard, ‘Once denied treatment, now welcomed…’, 18 December 2021 ↩
-
The Business Standard, ‘Once denied treatment, now welcomed…’, 18 December 2021 ↩
-
Shahanur, I, ‘How can society promote equality and respect for LGBTQI+ rights…’, 1 April 2023 ↩
-
USSD, ‘2022 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices’ (section 6), 20 March 2023 ↩
-
DFAT, ‘Country Information Report Bangladesh’ (paragraph 3.122), November 2022 ↩
-
DFAT, ‘Country Information Report Bangladesh’ (paragraph 3.121), November 2022 ↩
-
IRI, ‘Understanding the Lives of Bangladesh’s LGBTI Community’ (pages 1, 2, 6), 8 April 2021 ↩
-
GHRD, ‘LGBTQ+ Rights in Bangladesh’ (page 13), June 2022 ↩
-
USSD, ‘2022 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices’ (section 6), 20 March 2023 ↩
-
DFAT, ‘Country Information Report Bangladesh’ (paragraph 3.126), November 2022 ↩
-
Freedom House, ‘Freedom on the Net 2022: Bangladesh’ (section B7), 18 October 2022 ↩
-
USSD, ‘2022 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices’ (section 6), 20 March 2023 ↩
-
IRI, ‘Understanding the Lives of Bangladesh’s LGBTI Community’ (page 8), 8 April 2021 ↩
-
Twitter, ‘Dhaka Pride (@dhkpride) / Twitter’, joined November 2022 ↩
-
Inclusive Bangladesh, ‘Dhaka Pride: Pride2Power’, no date ↩