Research and analysis

Delivering better value for money: understanding differences in unit costs

Analysis of unit costs in the social housing sector.

Applies to England

Documents

Delivering better value for money: understanding differences in unit costs – summary report

Request an accessible format.
If you use assistive technology (such as a screen reader) and need a version of this document in a more accessible format, please email [email protected]. Please tell us what format you need. It will help us if you say what assistive technology you use.

Delivering better value for money: understanding differences in unit costs – technical regression report

Request an accessible format.
If you use assistive technology (such as a screen reader) and need a version of this document in a more accessible format, please email [email protected]. Please tell us what format you need. It will help us if you say what assistive technology you use.

Delivering better value for money: review of value for money self-assessments

Request an accessible format.
If you use assistive technology (such as a screen reader) and need a version of this document in a more accessible format, please email [email protected]. Please tell us what format you need. It will help us if you say what assistive technology you use.

Details

The summary report summarises the regulator’s analysis of unit costs in the social housing sector. This analysis aims to help providers, boards and stakeholders better understand providers’ costs – at sector and provider level – and how they relate to a range of cost drivers.

The technical report sets out the detail of regression analysis undertaken by the regulator on unit costs of private registered providers of social housing. This report is intended for a technical audience and presents detail of data definitions and the statistical process.

The review of value for money self-assessments sets out key issues and themes that the regulator has identified from its reviews of providers’ Value for Money self-assessments. It provides commentary both on the most recent assessments that providers have published in 2015, and on how the sector’s response to the VfM Standard has evolved over recent years.

Updates to this page

Published 8 June 2016

Sign up for emails or print this page