Research and analysis

Exam and assessment marking research

Research papers by Ofqual, QCA and NAA into marking of exams and assessments.

• From: Ofqual
• Published: 22 December 2000
• Last updated: 27 July 2017 — See all updates

Applies to England, Northern Ireland and Wales

Documents

The Effect of Sample Size on Increased Precision in Detecting Errant Marking (Al-Bayatti & Jones, 2005)

PDF, 76.5 KB, 10 pages

This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology.

Request an accessible format.

If you use assistive technology (such as a screen reader) and need a version of this document in a more accessible format, please email [email protected]. Please tell us what format you need. It will help us if you say what assistive technology you use.

An evaluation of external marking review services during 2000 (Newton & Whetton, 2000)

PDF, 16.7 MB, 238 pages

This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology.

Request an accessible format.

If you use assistive technology (such as a screen reader) and need a version of this document in a more accessible format, please email [email protected]. Please tell us what format you need. It will help us if you say what assistive technology you use.

Evaluation of Reviews of Marking and Moderation 2016: study and survey (Howard & Black, 2017)

Ref: Ofqual/17/6253

PDF, 3.31 MB, 102 pages

This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology.

Request an accessible format.

If you use assistive technology (such as a screen reader) and need a version of this document in a more accessible format, please email [email protected]. Please tell us what format you need. It will help us if you say what assistive technology you use.

An exploratory investigation into how moderators of non-examined assessments make their judgements (Cuff, 2017)

Ref: Ofqual/17/6252

PDF, 647 KB, 44 pages

This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology.

Request an accessible format.

If you use assistive technology (such as a screen reader) and need a version of this document in a more accessible format, please email [email protected]. Please tell us what format you need. It will help us if you say what assistive technology you use.

Final Report for Research on Marker Selection (Meadows & Billington, 2007)

PDF, 325 KB, 60 pages

This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology.

Request an accessible format.

If you use assistive technology (such as a screen reader) and need a version of this document in a more accessible format, please email [email protected]. Please tell us what format you need. It will help us if you say what assistive technology you use.

An Investigation of Targeted Double Marking for GCSE and GCE (Fearnley, 2005)

PDF, 205 KB, 28 pages

This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology.

Request an accessible format.

If you use assistive technology (such as a screen reader) and need a version of this document in a more accessible format, please email [email protected]. Please tell us what format you need. It will help us if you say what assistive technology you use.

Is teaching experience necessary for key stage 3 English markers? (Royal-Dawson, 2005)

PDF, 357 KB, 68 pages

This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology.

Request an accessible format.

If you use assistive technology (such as a screen reader) and need a version of this document in a more accessible format, please email [email protected]. Please tell us what format you need. It will help us if you say what assistive technology you use.

Marking Reliability of the Key Stage 2 National Curriculum English Writing Tests in England (Ofqual, 2014)

Ref: Ofqual/14/5377

PDF, 616 KB, 33 pages

This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology.

Request an accessible format.

If you use assistive technology (such as a screen reader) and need a version of this document in a more accessible format, please email [email protected]. Please tell us what format you need. It will help us if you say what assistive technology you use.

On your marks: A review of awarding bodies' capacity to mark GCSE, A level, principal learning and project examinations in summer 2009 (Ofqual, 2009)

Ref: Ofqual/09/4265

PDF, 40.8 KB, 10 pages

This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology.

Request an accessible format.

If you use assistive technology (such as a screen reader) and need a version of this document in a more accessible format, please email [email protected]. Please tell us what format you need. It will help us if you say what assistive technology you use.

Research into alternative marking review processes for exams (Ofqual, 2015)

Ref: Ofqual/15/5804

PDF, 1.2 MB, 58 pages

This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology.

Request an accessible format.

If you use assistive technology (such as a screen reader) and need a version of this document in a more accessible format, please email [email protected]. Please tell us what format you need. It will help us if you say what assistive technology you use.

Research into marking quality: Studies to inform future work on national curriculum assessments (QCA, 2009)

Ref: QCA/09/4042

PDF, 113 KB, 20 pages

This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology.

Request an accessible format.

If you use assistive technology (such as a screen reader) and need a version of this document in a more accessible format, please email [email protected]. Please tell us what format you need. It will help us if you say what assistive technology you use.

A review of the literature on marking reliability (Meadows & Billington, 2005)

PDF, 442 KB, 89 pages

This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology.

Request an accessible format.

If you use assistive technology (such as a screen reader) and need a version of this document in a more accessible format, please email [email protected]. Please tell us what format you need. It will help us if you say what assistive technology you use.

Reviews of marking and moderation resulting in grade changes of 2 grades or more Summer 2016 examination series (Ofqual, 2017)

Ref: Ofqual/17/6254

PDF, 594 KB, 24 pages

This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology.

Request an accessible format.

If you use assistive technology (such as a screen reader) and need a version of this document in a more accessible format, please email [email protected]. Please tell us what format you need. It will help us if you say what assistive technology you use.

Reviews of marking and moderation: subject level analyses: Summer 2016 exam series (Ofqual, 2017)

Ref: Ofqual/17/6255

PDF, 1.02 MB, 39 pages

This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology.

Request an accessible format.

If you use assistive technology (such as a screen reader) and need a version of this document in a more accessible format, please email [email protected]. Please tell us what format you need. It will help us if you say what assistive technology you use.

Details

Research into marking.

Published 22 December 2000
Last updated 27 July 2017 + show all updates

1. 27 July 2017

   Added 4 reports: 'Reviews of marking and moderation resulting in grade changes of 2 grades or more: Summer 2016 examination series', 'An exploratory investigation into how moderators of non-examined assessments make their judgements', 'Evaluation of Reviews of Marking and Moderation 2016: Study and survey' and 'Reviews of marking and moderation: subject level analyses: Summer 2016 exam series'.

2. 22 December 2000

   First published.