Research and analysis

UK broadband impact study: literature review

This literature review is the first part of a study which aims to provide a comprehensive assessment of the outcomes of the government’s investments in the UK’s Broadband network.

• From: Department for Science, Innovation and Technology and Department for Digital, Culture, Media & Sport
• Published: 19 February 2013
• Last updated: 26 February 2013 — See all updates

Documents

UK broadband impact study: literature review

MS Word Document, 1.32 MB

This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology.

Request an accessible format.

If you use assistive technology (such as a screen reader) and need a version of this document in a more accessible format, please email [email protected]. Please tell us what format you need. It will help us if you say what assistive technology you use.

UK broadband impact study: literature review

PDF, 890 KB, 51 pages

This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology.

Request an accessible format.

If you use assistive technology (such as a screen reader) and need a version of this document in a more accessible format, please email [email protected]. Please tell us what format you need. It will help us if you say what assistive technology you use.

Details

This literature review is the first stage of a study that will cover economic growth, social outcomes and environmental impacts. The Impact Study will be split into two stages; pre-rollout and post-rollout.

The primary purpose of the pre-rollout stage is to increase our understanding of the effect of faster broadband on people’s lives and then translate these findings into quantified estimates of the potential impact of the Government’s broadband projects. The post-rollout stage will conduct an impact evaluation of the Government’s broadband investments.

A consortium comprising SQW, Cambridge Econometrics and Dr Pantelis Koutroumpis has been contracted to deliver the pre-rollout stage.

Published 19 February 2013
Last updated 26 February 2013 + show all updates

1. 26 February 2013

   Updated description to make clear this is a literature review, and part of a larger study.

2. 19 February 2013

   First published.