Independent report

Good work: the Taylor review of modern working practices

An independent review of modern working practices by Matthew Taylor, chief executive of the Royal Society of Arts.

• From: Department for Business and Trade and Department for Business, Energy & Industrial Strategy
• Published: 11 July 2017
• Last updated: 4 May 2018 — See all updates

Documents

Good work: the Taylor review of modern working practices

PDF, 3.75 MB, 116 pages

This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology.

Request an accessible format.

If you use assistive technology (such as a screen reader) and need a version of this document in a more accessible format, please email [email protected]. Please tell us what format you need. It will help us if you say what assistive technology you use.

Responses: A-B

ZIP, 12.1 MB

This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology.

Request an accessible format.

If you use assistive technology (such as a screen reader) and need a version of this document in a more accessible format, please email [email protected]. Please tell us what format you need. It will help us if you say what assistive technology you use.

Responses: C-D

ZIP, 16.8 MB

This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology.

Request an accessible format.

If you use assistive technology (such as a screen reader) and need a version of this document in a more accessible format, please email [email protected]. Please tell us what format you need. It will help us if you say what assistive technology you use.

Responses: E-I

ZIP, 19 MB

This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology.

Request an accessible format.

If you use assistive technology (such as a screen reader) and need a version of this document in a more accessible format, please email [email protected]. Please tell us what format you need. It will help us if you say what assistive technology you use.

Responses: K-O

ZIP, 10.5 MB

This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology.

Request an accessible format.

If you use assistive technology (such as a screen reader) and need a version of this document in a more accessible format, please email [email protected]. Please tell us what format you need. It will help us if you say what assistive technology you use.

Responses: P-S

ZIP, 14.2 MB

This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology.

Request an accessible format.

If you use assistive technology (such as a screen reader) and need a version of this document in a more accessible format, please email [email protected]. Please tell us what format you need. It will help us if you say what assistive technology you use.

Responses: T-U

ZIP, 21.6 MB

This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology.

Request an accessible format.

If you use assistive technology (such as a screen reader) and need a version of this document in a more accessible format, please email [email protected]. Please tell us what format you need. It will help us if you say what assistive technology you use.

Responses: V-X

ZIP, 11.4 MB

This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology.

Request an accessible format.

If you use assistive technology (such as a screen reader) and need a version of this document in a more accessible format, please email [email protected]. Please tell us what format you need. It will help us if you say what assistive technology you use.

Details

This independent review considers the implications of new forms of work on worker rights and responsibilities, as well as on employer freedoms and obligations. It sets out 7 principles to address the challenges facing the UK labour market.

If you have any questions or comments about the review, please contact [email protected].

The review invited individuals and organisations to submit written evidence to help highlight some of the current issues in the labour market. We have published the submissions in full here in zip files.

Published 11 July 2017
Last updated 4 May 2018 + show all updates

1. 4 May 2018

   Submissions to the Matthew Taylor Review published.

2. 11 July 2017

   First published.