Guidance

RPC case histories – counterfactuals, September 2020

This is the RPC's case histories section on counterfactuals, September 2020.

• From: Regulatory Policy Committee
• Published: 28 September 2020

Documents

RPC case histories – counterfactuals, September 2020

PDF, 308 KB, 14 pages

This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology.

Request an accessible format.

If you use assistive technology (such as a screen reader) and need a version of this document in a more accessible format, please email [email protected]. Please tell us what format you need. It will help us if you say what assistive technology you use.

Details

This section of case histories provides guidance to departments on the use of counterfactuals in impact assessments. It provides advice on standard, ‘do nothing’ counterfactuals and describes when it might be appropriate to use alternative counterfactuals. The section includes examples of cases the RPC has seen for scrutiny and advice, in areas such as transport.

The RPC welcomes any feedback on our guidance. Please contact us here to give us feedback or if you have any questions on RPC case histories - counterfactuals.

Published 28 September 2020